ITIL® COLLEGE

CMMITILCOBITProcessCompareKpi

by admin on February 5, 2012

CMM ITIL COBIT Process Compare Kpi

 

A common strategy today is to align your business processes in the Information Technology function with process models and methodologies, such as CMM ITIL COBIT Process Compare KPI.  This is called CMM ITIL COBIT Process Alignment and we can CMM ITIL COBIT Process Compare KPI. All are excellent choices for achieving best practice performance and many success stories reveal excellent benchmarks from CMM ITIL COBIT Process Alignment strategies.

 

Management agenda is different for each of the three value configurations, and that the management agenda helps identify opportunities for new types of information systems for CMM ITIL COBIT Process Compare KPI. The chains, shops and networks model also contributes to discussions of IT strategy, and its alignment with business strategy. For example, where a single business contains different configurations, the IT strategy must be aligned to the dominant value configuration of the business. And CMM ITIL COBIT Process Compare KPI is no exception here.

 

Model Driven Configuration Management: Configuration Management is a key part of IT Service Management. The major process frameworks (CMM ITIL COBIT Process Compare KPI) all call for it. According to ITIL, Configuration Management’s goals are to “account for all the IT assets and configurations within the organization and its services.” What’s in scope? All applications, components, databases, servers, message queues, ETL jobs, and so forth become CIs, or Configuration Items.

 

However, this seems to imply some sort of interface between the source code control tool (aka software configuration management tool/repository) and the CMDB. Source code control tools such as PVCS, VSS, or CVS play an essential role in the software development lifecycle, but they are essentially just specialized file management systems with the ability to compare text files. The overall structure of an application is not represented in the source code control system, which is hierarchical and focused on the source code – basically, just a managed directory structure with some extra capability, by no means a modeling tool.

 

A modern distributed system’s complexity comes in the interconnections and dependencies on things like databases and middleware, which the version control system does not represent. A simple distributed system for example might have a database with stored procedures, several interlinked components on an application/web server, and dependencies on other systems via message queues. These dependencies cannot be derived directly from the software configuration management system.

 

ITIL Security KPI – This is a hard topic to nail down because ITIL, by its very nature is non prescriptive, that is it stays at a high level and deliberately does not say “now you must do this activity this way etc”. What it does is give you guidelines that if you follow you will be providing the right amount of information to the other processes and to your business managers.

 

Having said that, some of the other frameworks are far more prescriptive and detail specific KPI’s that must be measured. This can also be their downfall because, although they may give a significant amount of detail, they can also be providing too much detail. Why is that, you say? Because there is a cost in providing that detail in time and resources, so if there is no real business benefit to provide that detail you shouldn’t be wasting that time and those resources we were referring to.

 

ITIL Security KPI- CMM ITIL COBIT Process Compare KPI: Here are a number of KPI’s if we were measuring them that we might use:

 

  • Reduced number of security-related service calls, change requests and fixes
  • Amount of downtime caused by security incidents
  • Reduced turnaround time for security administration requests
  • Number of systems subject to an intrusion detection process
  • Number of systems with active monitoring capabilities
  • Reduced time to investigate security incidents
  • Time lag between detection, reporting and acting upon security incidents
  • Number of IT security awareness training days

 

As the pace of change in business increases, business risk is compounded by unaligned and rigid IT infrastructure. However, enterprises that incorporate business process fusion will see increased IT infrastructure flexibility that improves returns and risk, according to GartnerG2, a research service from Gartner, Inc.

 

Business process fusion is the transformation of business activities achieved by integrating previously autonomous business processes to create a new scope of management capabilities such as CMM ITIL COBIT Process Alignment strategies. It will drive stronger alignment of IT with core business processes and provide linkage of operational and management processes with a true end-to-end scope. Business process fusion is not just another IT integration project. The objective of CMM ITIL COBIT Process Alignment strategies is to integrate business processes to create value, regardless of how or even whether, the underlying technology is integrated.

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Digg Delicious Reddit Stumbleupon

Previous post:

Next post: